Multitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

TitleMultitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsFoster, Nathan R., Lindsay A. Renfro, Steven E. Schild, Mary W. Redman, Xiaofei F. Wang, Suzanne E. Dahlberg, Keyue Ding, Penelope A. Bradbury, Suresh S. Ramalingam, David R. Gandara, Taro Shibata, Nagahiro Saijo, Everett E. Vokes, Alex A. Adjei, and Sumithra J. Mandrekar
JournalJ Thorac Oncol
Volume10
Issue7
Pagination1099-106
Date Published2015 Jul
ISSN1556-1380
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Trials as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Disease-Free Survival, Endpoint Determination, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Survival Analysis, Young Adult
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We previously reported that progression-free survival (PFS) may be a candidate surrogate end point for overall survival (OS) in first-line extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) using data from three randomized trials (Foster, Cancer 2011). In this validation study (N0424-Alliance), we assessed the patient-level and trial-level surrogacy of PFS using data from seven new first-line phase II/III ES-SCLC trials and across all 10 trials as well (seven new, three previous).METHODS: Individual patient data were utilized across the seven new trials (2259 patients) and all 10 trials (2855 patients). Patient-level surrogacy (Kendall's τ) was assessed using the Clayton copula bivariate survival model. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through association of the log hazard ratios on OS and PFS across trials, including weighted (by trial size) least squares regression (WLS R²) of Cox model effects and correlation of the copula effects (copula R²). The minimum effect on the surrogate (MES) needed to detect a nonzero treatment effect on OS was also calculated.RESULTS: The median OS and PFS across all 10 trials were 9.8 and 5.9 months, respectively. PFS showed strong surrogacy within the 7 new trials (copula R² = 0.90 [standard error = 0.27], WLS R² = 0.83 [95% confidence interval: 0.43, 0.95]; MES = 0.67, and Kendall's τ = 0.58) and across all 10 trials (copula R² = 0.81 [standard errors = 0.25], WLS R² = 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.91], MES = 0.70, and Kendall's τ = 0.57).CONCLUSIONS: PFS demonstrated strong surrogacy for OS in first-line ES-SCLC based on this external validation study of individual patient data. PFS is a good alternative end point to OS and should be considered when resource constraints (time or patient) might make it useful or desirable in place of OS. Additional analyses are needed to assess its appropriateness for targeted agents in this disease setting.

DOI10.1097/JTO.0000000000000548
Alternate JournalJ Thorac Oncol
Original PublicationMultitrial evaluation of progression-free survival as a surrogate end point for overall survival in first-line extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
PubMed ID26134227
PubMed Central IDPMC4493926
Grant ListCA33601 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA031946 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA033601 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA180821 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA066636 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
UG1 CA233180 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA180882 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA180867 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
CA31946 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
CA25224 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA023318 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
P01 CA142538 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA180794 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA025224 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U10 CA180888 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Project: